[FC-discuss] UK Fair Use?
Rob Myers
rob at robmyers.org
Mon May 14 04:55:00 JST 2007
Ringo Kamens wrote:
> So should I completely remove the fair use section? I think that even
> though it isn't backed by legal ground in the UK, it is important to
> mention that DRM takes away user rights. Should I just remove fair use
> and say owner's rights or something like that?
> Comrade Ringo Kamens
In this context the "owner" is the rights holder, who is the person
adding the DRM. The user or consumer, the audience, doesn't have many
rights in UK law to limit.
What we are meant to have is a public service broadcaster that takes our
licence fee and uses it to provide us with world-class television
programmes in ways that are of value to us. If that public service
broadcaster is more interested in sucking up to Microsoft or not
frightening other "content providers", none of whom have the same
charter as the BBC, then it is betraying its public and failing to
create public value.
There's two ways of putting this argument to the BBC that I can think of.
The first is to argue that the BBC has always been a leader in new ways
of providing value to the public: television, teletext, video, CD-ROM,
the internet. At no point before has it seen fit to sell out its public
to special interest groups such as Microsoft. This is an appeal to fair
play rather than Fair Use. ;-)
The second is to keep the Fair Use argument by pointing out that BBC
television broadcasts are subject to the Fair Dealing right of time
shifting, which in the US would be Fair Use, and to point out how DRM
prevents this general principle from being applied to online content.
Not to mention how it will depress viewing figures.
The big problem for UK TV channels is that lots of their programs are
made by small but very vocal independent production houses (the trend to
outsourcing here is the opposite of the US trend to making more and more
programmes in-house). I wouldn't be surprised if these have had a quiet
word with the BBC, and the BBC can ill afford to annoy them.
Thank you for doing this letter, it's great.
- Rob.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list