[FC-discuss] New Girl Talk

[Elizabeth Stark]

Exactly.

On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Fred Benenson <fred.benenson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I assume you mean sued by the original samplee, not GT
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Elizabeth Stark <emstark at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm..if people remix GT's "CC" album and also get sued, now that would be
>> a case...
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Fred Benenson <fred.benenson at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Feel free not to download the album, or download it and not pay for it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Rob Myers <rob at robmyers.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Elizabeth Stark wrote:
>>>> > Yup, super sketchy b/c you can't separate those elements out from the
>>>> > infringing work itself.
>>>>
>>>> NC-ing appropriation art is, on balance, a bit of a fail.
>>>>
>>>> http://robmyers.org/weblog/2006/03/26/sampling-artists-and-nc/
>>>>
>>>> And it doesn't explain the situation to consumers, who will assume that
>>>> the license means that they can't be hassled over posessing an
>>>> infringing work.
>>>>
>>>> - Rob.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Discuss mailing list
>>>> Discuss at freeculture.org
>>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> Discuss at freeculture.org
>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at freeculture.org
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at freeculture.org
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://freeculture.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080702/330489a4/attachment.htm