No subject
Sun Jun 29 23:55:31 EDT 2008
College funding bill passed with anti-P2P provisions
intact<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080801-college-funding-bill-passed-with-anti-p2p-provisions-intact.html>
By Ryan Paul <http://arstechnica.com/authors.ars/segphault> | Published:
August 01, 2008 - 06:15AM CT
The Senate and House have voted to reauthorize the Higher Education Act and
approved controversial new provisions that will require universities to
provide students with access to commercial music downloading services and
implement traffic filtering technologies in order to deter peer-to-peer
filesharing. The bill now goes to President Bush, who is expected to sign it
into law.
These provisions have strong support from the content industry, but have
been targeted with widespread criticism from the academic community and
advocacy groups such as Educause. The push for mandatory filtering at
universities began in 2007 when the RIAA published a list of top piracy
schools <http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070222-8900.html> and the
MPAA claimed that piracy on university campuses accounts for 44 percent of
the movie industry's annual losses to piracy. The group later retracted this
claim when it was discovered that the numbers were grossly
inflated<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080122-oops-mpaa-admits-college-piracy-numbers-grossly-inflated.html>.
The RIAA followed up its top piracy school list with a litigation and
propaganda campaign<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070301-8953.html>which
included the development of a web site to handle automated
settlements, but soon faced serious
setbacks<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070715-judge-deals-another-blow-to-riaas-war-against-on-campus-filesharing.html>in
court.
The MPAA also developed an Ubuntu-based software toolkit for detecting
file-sharing on university networks, but was forced to discontinue
distribution of the software when they were hit with a Digital Millenium
Copyright Act takedown notice. The MPAA had violated copyright
law<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071204-mpaas-university-toolkit-hit-with-dmca-takedown-notice-after-gpl-violation.html>by
failing to adhere to the General Public License under which Ubuntu is
distributed.
The MPAA's high-tech anti-piracy solution
The RIAA and MPAA have vigorously lobbied for a legislative solution at both
the state<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080511-big-content-fighting-campus-p2p-by-lobbying-for-state-laws.html>and
federal<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080320-mpaa-to-congress-filtering-is-in-colleges-best-interests.html>levels.
Pressure from the content industry compelled Congress to begin
investigating
the issue<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070503-congress-to-universities-curb-piracy-or-we-will-be-forced-to-act.html>.
The lobbying efforts eventually resulted in the addition of anti-piracy
provisions in the College Opportunity and Affordability Act in the House,
which passed<http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080207-controversial-college-funding-bill-passedp2p-proviso-intact.html>by
a wide margin in February. The Senate version of this bill passed
today
with bipartisan support.
A statement issued by the joint House and Senate committees responsible for
harmonizing the two versions of the bill explains that universities will
have to begin authoring formal piracy deterrence plans. The statement also
recommends several commercial anti-P2P technologies including Audible
Magic's CopySense Network Appliance and Red Lambda's Integrity filtering
tool.
"[The amendment includes] language requiring institutions to make available
the development of plans to detect and prevent unauthorized distribution of
copyrighted material on the institution of higher education's information
technology system," the statement says. "The Conferees have combined
elements from both bills to require institutions to advise students about
this issue and to certify that all institutions have plans to combat and
reduce illegal peer to peer file sharing."
The MPAA hailed the bill's passage. "We work closely with leaders in the
higher education community because we both have a stake in ensuring that
intellectual property continues to be a strong, vibrant part of our nation's
economy," said MPAA president Dan Glickman. "By including these important
provisions in the Higher Education Act, Congress is sending a strong message
that intellectual property is worth protecting."
The MPAA will shortly begin sending out what it describes as "campus
briefing books" that contain information on the anti-piracy provisions of
the new law and what schools need to do in order to be in compliance. The
books will also offer hints on how to clamp down on P2P traffic and detect
infringement.
There are presently no penalties for failing to comply with the requirement,
but Educause and many in the academic community fear that the new provisions
are a trojan horse that will open the door for Congress to add penalties in
future iterations. If this happens, universities could potentially be denied
funding if they don't agree to play copyright cop.
------=_Part_5615_17089497.1217616469373
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<div dir="ltr">Should we talk more about what can be done with this now that it's expected to be signed into law?<br><br>From Ars Technica:<br><h1>
<font size="2"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080801-college-funding-bill-passed-with-anti-p2p-provisions-intact.html">College funding bill passed with anti-P2P provisions intact</a></font></h1>
<p class="Tag Full">By <a href="http://arstechnica.com/authors.ars/segphault">Ryan Paul</a>
| Published: August 01, 2008 - 06:15AM CT
</p>
<p>
The Senate and House have voted to reauthorize the Higher Education Act
and approved controversial new provisions that will require
universities to provide students with access to commercial music
downloading services and implement traffic filtering technologies in
order to deter peer-to-peer filesharing. The bill now goes to President
Bush, who is expected to sign it into law.<br>
</p>
<p>
These provisions have strong support from the content industry, but
have been targeted with widespread criticism from the academic
community and advocacy groups such as Educause. The push for mandatory
filtering at universities began in 2007 when the RIAA published a list
of <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070222-8900.html">top piracy schools</a>
and the MPAA claimed that piracy on university campuses accounts for 44
percent of the movie industry's annual losses to piracy. The group
later retracted this claim when it was discovered that the numbers were
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080122-oops-mpaa-admits-college-piracy-numbers-grossly-inflated.html">grossly inflated</a>. The RIAA followed up its top piracy school list with a <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070301-8953.html">litigation and propaganda campaign</a> which included the development of a web site to handle automated settlements, but soon faced serious <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070715-judge-deals-another-blow-to-riaas-war-against-on-campus-filesharing.html">setbacks</a> in court.
</p>
<p>
The MPAA also developed an Ubuntu-based software toolkit for detecting
file-sharing on university networks, but was forced to discontinue
distribution of the software when they were hit with a Digital
Millenium Copyright Act takedown notice. The MPAA had <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071204-mpaas-university-toolkit-hit-with-dmca-takedown-notice-after-gpl-violation.html">violated copyright law</a> by failing to adhere to the General Public License under which Ubuntu is distributed.
</p>
<div class="ImageRight">
<br>
<span class="ImageCaption">The MPAA's high-tech anti-piracy solution</span>
</div>
<p>
The RIAA and MPAA have vigorously lobbied for a legislative solution at both the <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080511-big-content-fighting-campus-p2p-by-lobbying-for-state-laws.html">state</a> and <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080320-mpaa-to-congress-filtering-is-in-colleges-best-interests.html">federal</a> levels. Pressure from the content industry compelled Congress to begin <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070503-congress-to-universities-curb-piracy-or-we-will-be-forced-to-act.html">investigating the issue</a>.
</p>
<p>
The lobbying efforts eventually resulted in the addition of anti-piracy
provisions in the College Opportunity and Affordability Act in the
House, which <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080207-controversial-college-funding-bill-passedp2p-proviso-intact.html">passed</a> by a wide margin in February. The Senate version of this bill passed today with bipartisan support.
</p>
<p>
A statement issued by the joint House and Senate committees responsible
for harmonizing the two versions of the bill explains that universities
will have to begin authoring formal piracy deterrence plans. The
statement also recommends several commercial anti-P2P technologies
including Audible Magic's CopySense Network Appliance and Red Lambda's
Integrity filtering tool.
</p>
<p>"[The amendment includes] language requiring institutions to make
available the development of plans to detect and prevent unauthorized
distribution of copyrighted material on the institution of higher
education's information technology system," the statement says. "The
Conferees have combined elements from both bills to require
institutions to advise students about this issue and to certify that
all institutions have plans to combat and reduce illegal peer to peer
file sharing."
</p>
<p>The MPAA hailed the bill's passage. "We work closely with leaders in
the higher education community because we both have a stake in ensuring
that intellectual property continues to be a strong, vibrant part of
our nation's economy," said MPAA president Dan Glickman. "By including
these important provisions in the Higher Education Act, Congress is
sending a strong message that intellectual property is worth
protecting."
</p>
<p>The MPAA will shortly begin sending out what it describes as "campus
briefing books" that contain information on the anti-piracy provisions
of the new law and what schools need to do in order to be in
compliance. The books will also offer hints on how to clamp down on P2P
traffic and detect infringement.
</p>
<p>There are presently no penalties for failing to comply with the
requirement, but Educause and many in the academic community fear that
the new provisions are a trojan horse that will open the door for
Congress to add penalties in future iterations. If this happens,
universities could potentially be denied funding if they don't agree to
play copyright cop.
</p></div>
------=_Part_5615_17089497.1217616469373--
More information about the Discuss
mailing list