[FC-discuss] "Intellectual property", do we really want to use that term?

[Brian Russell]

I like how they put it in:

http://freedomdefined.org/Definition

perhaps some modified version of this text could replace:

http://wiki.freeculture.org/Free_Culture_Definition

which seems a bit dry (its based on a fsf text)

brian

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:48 AM, Alex Kozak<akozak at creativecommons.org> wrote:
> How about something like "students for free culture aims to minimize the
> legal and technical barriers to sharing culture and knowledge" :)
> -Ak
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Ben Moskowitz <benrito at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> this is a much better description of our focus; is there a way to
>> simplify this statement?
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Elizabeth Stark wrote:
>>
>> > share, access, and rework culture and knowledge, along with an
>> > environment of technological freedom that supports it
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at freeculture.org
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Kozak
> Education Program Assistant
> ccLearn, Creative Commons
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at freeculture.org
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>