[FC-discuss] "Intellectual property", do we really want to use that term?

[Elizabeth Stark]

hmm, i prefer a more proactive approach, and less of a reactive one (i.e.
minimizing barriers)...

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Ben Moskowitz <benrito at gmail.com> wrote:

> any objections?
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Alex Kozak wrote:
>
> How about something like "students for free culture aims to minimize the
> legal and technical barriers to sharing culture and knowledge" :)
> -Ak
>
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Ben Moskowitz <benrito at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> this is a much better description of our focus; is there a way to
>> simplify this statement?
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2009, at 9:40 AM, Elizabeth Stark wrote:
>>
>> > share, access, and rework culture and knowledge, along with an
>> > environment of technological freedom that supports it
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at freeculture.org
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Kozak
> Education Program Assistant
> ccLearn, Creative Commons
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at freeculture.org
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at freeculture.org
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://freeculture.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20090820/67bb6223/attachment.htm