[FC-discuss] "Intellectual property", do we really want to use that term?

[Matthew O. Brimer]

Personally, I liked Elizabeth's wording a lot better:

> we promote the ability to share, access, and rework culture and  
> knowledge, along with an environment of technological freedom that  
> supports it.

Barriers only get in the way -- we have ideas/visions/goals above and  
beyond simply minimizing or "bulldozing" anything. The above takes a  
proactive, positive, and strong approach without focusing on any  
negativity or inferiority at all.

Cheers,
	—MOB

On Aug 20, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Ryan Prior wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Elizabeth Stark<emstark at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>> hmm, i prefer a more proactive approach, and less of a reactive one  
>> (i.e.
>> minimizing barriers)...
>
> The pro-active approach to minimizing barriers would be bulldozing  
> them, right?
>
> "Students for Free Culture is a bulldozer on the path of legal and
> technical barriers to sharing culture and knowledge."
>
> Defined, y'all.
>
>
> Ryan
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at freeculture.org
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://freeculture.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20090820/3d2a2942/attachment.htm