<span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;">The topic appears to be related to legal issues around the music industry.<br><br>"</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: "Courier New";">
ELI promotes discussion and debate on the most
compelling legal issues facing the music industry today. </span><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;">"<br><br>the full application can be found here: <a href="http://www.grammy.com/PDFs/GRAMMY_Foundation/ELIRules08.pdf">
http://www.grammy.com/PDFs/GRAMMY_Foundation/ELIRules08.pdf</a><br><br>I am willing to support action. <br><br>I would suggest that they change the language to reflect the Open Acce</span><font size="2">ss legal publishing norms. Possibly use one of the licensing agreements for a law review that has adopted the Science Commons Open Access Law Principles. Here is a list of the principles.:
<br></font><p style="font-style: italic;"><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;">THEREFORE, WE ADOPT the following four principles as part of our publication policy:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;"></span></p>
<ol><li><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;">The
Journal will require from the Author no more than a reasonable,
limited-term exclusive license for commercial publication. The Journal
will not interfere at any time with the author's freedom to make his or
her work available under a license as free as <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/">the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License</a>.</span></li><li><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;">
In
the event of reprinting or republication (of any part) of the Article
the Author will always attribute first publication to the Journal,
unless the Journal does not require this.</span></li><li><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;">Upon
publication of the Article, the Journal will make available to the
Author an electronic version of the edited Article—such as the PDF or
the word processing document of the published Article—with the
expectation that this will be posted in an <a href="http://archives.eprints.org/">Open Access Repository.</a></span></li><li><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;">In
the event that the Journal does not use the Science Commons Open Access
Law Model Publication Agreement, it will post a current copy of its
publication agreement on its web site, and will ensure that its
agreement complies with these four principles.</span></li></ol><font size="2"><br><br>-Brian<br></font><span style="font-family: arial,lucida,helvetica,sans-serif;"></span><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/20/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Elizabeth Stark</b> <<a href="mailto:estark@law.harvard.edu">estark@law.harvard.edu</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Really? Do you know what their topic was?<br><br>I've seen this in the past but always dismissed it in that I didn't<br>think any FC-type work would really be eligible..<br><br>On 9/20/07, Fred Benenson <<a href="mailto:fred.benenson@gmail.com">
fred.benenson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Yah, and if they refuse, we could shame them and call them out on it.<br>><br>> Coincidentally, I know someone who actually won this award, but I'm not sure<br>> that makes much of a difference.
<br>><br>><br>> F<br>><br>><br>><br>> On 9/20/07, Dana Powers <<a href="mailto:dana.powers@gmail.com">dana.powers@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > ask if they'd settle for a non-exclusive license?
<br>> ><br>> > > What action should we take?<br>> > ><br>> > > Denver<br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > Discuss mailing list<br>> > <a href="mailto:Discuss@freeculture.org">
Discuss@freeculture.org</a><br>> > <a href="http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>> ><br>><br>><br>> _______________________________________________
<br>> Discuss mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:Discuss@freeculture.org">Discuss@freeculture.org</a><br>> <a href="http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss">http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
</a><br>><br>><br>_______________________________________________<br>Discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Discuss@freeculture.org">Discuss@freeculture.org</a><br><a href="http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss">
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Brian Rowe<br><a href="mailto:Brian@freedomforip.org">Brian@freedomforip.org</a><br>(206) 335-8577 (Cell)<br>
<br>Access To Justice Technology Principles<br><a href="http://www.ATJWeb.org">www.ATJWeb.org</a><br><br>Freedom for IP <br><a href="http://www.FreedomforIP.org">www.FreedomforIP.org</a>