<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><A href="http://www.laridae.at/releases.php?id=49&PHPSESSID=88e9a5c16cf1a513a336e370238ce044"><IMG height=240 src="http://www.laridae.at/releases/laridae045_240x240.jpg" width=240 border=0></A> Lobotomixremixuploadfrombrains.is ilegal<BR><BR>--- El <B>lun 19-ene-09, Fred Benenson <I><fred.benenson@gmail.com></I></B> escribió:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid">De: Fred Benenson <fred.benenson@gmail.com><BR>Asunto: Re: [FC-discuss] Anil Dash: DRM and Friends<BR>Para: "Discussion of Free Culture in general and this organization in particular" <discuss@freeculture.org><BR>Fecha: lunes, 19 de enero de 2009, 12:56 pm<BR><BR>
<DIV id=yiv1962570326>Rob hinted at this but DRM also implies that machines are capable of adjudicating fair uses. The DMCA makes specific mention that the law "should not effect fair use" but in practice this hasn't been the case -- BluRay players assume that unless you are watching the film you are making an illegal copy. In fact any remixing from DVDs is illegal, even if the resulting work is a fair use.<BR><BR><BR>F<BR><BR clear=all><BR><BR>~ ~ ~<BR>thoughts / <A href="http://fredbenenson.com/blog" target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://fredbenenson.com/blog</A> <BR>work / <A href="http://creativecommons.org/" target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://creativecommons.org</A> <BR>sights / <A href="http://flickr.com/fcb" target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://flickr.com/fcb</A><BR>sounds / <A href="http://www.last.fm/user/mecredis" target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://www.last.fm/user/mecredis</A><BR>status / <A href="http://twitter.com/mecredis" target=_blank
rel=nofollow>http://twitter.com/mecredis</A><BR><BR><BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Rob Myers <SPAN dir=ltr><<A href="mailto:rob@robmyers.org" target=_blank rel=nofollow>rob@robmyers.org</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid">
<DIV class=Ih2E3d>On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Adi Kamdar <<A href="mailto:adikamdar@gmail.com" target=_blank rel=nofollow>adikamdar@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR><BR>> So, with all of that being said, how are privacy settings on social networks<BR>> different than DRM restrictions placed on media content files from<BR>> companies?<BR><BR></DIV>How is locking the door to one's home when one goes out different from<BR>being locked in a cell for life?<BR><BR>Privacy settings come from the right to privacy and from freedom to<BR>association. DRM comes from an extreme misunderstanding of copyright<BR>as a form of (wannabe) perpetual property.<BR><BR>Privacy settings are local, controlled by the user, and circumventable<BR>in technology and law. DRM isn't.<BR><BR>Privacy settings are similar to passwords, not to DRM.<BR><BR>- Rob.<BR>_______________________________________________<BR>Discuss mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:Discuss@freeculture.org" target=_blank rel=nofollow>Discuss@freeculture.org</A><BR><A href="http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV><PRE>_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@freeculture.org
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table><br>
<hr size=1><br><font face="Verdana" size="-2">Yahoo! Cocina<br>Recetas prácticas y comida saludable<br>
Visitá http://ar.mujer.yahoo.com/cocina/