Although Fairey would claim a non-commercial free use over his image, I wonder if the judge would argue that the work was so transformative that it impacted (beyond Fairey's control) the commercial market (aka. others making money off the image, though that of course infringes on Fairey's copyright) in a way that somehow affects the definition of free use. <br>
<br>Alex<br><br clear="all">Alexander Leavitt<br>Boston University 2009<br><a href="http://alexleavitt.com">http://alexleavitt.com</a><br>Twitter: @alexleavitt<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Matt Lee <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mattl@cnuk.org">mattl@cnuk.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Ryan Prior <<a href="mailto:ryanprior@gmail.com">ryanprior@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Allow me to cast the first stone: <a href="http://changeyarly.ytmnd.com/" target="_blank">http://changeyarly.ytmnd.com/</a><br>
<br>
</div>Thanks for the seizure.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Matt Lee<br>
Free Software, etc.<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">_______________________________________________<br>
Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Discuss@freeculture.org">Discuss@freeculture.org</a><br>
<a href="http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss" target="_blank">http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>